Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Predictions and More Predictions ...

The smart analysts refuse to make predictions which is the strategy Economic Undertow will follow. I will instead focus on what is happening in the present that the rest are ignoring.

For those who are prediction- deprived, the following is a smörgåsbord of 'Brand X' predictions from other analysts.

Phil's Stock World looks for a crash that may or may not happen, he's predicting, not me:


We are still trying to stay on top of things with our $10K to $50K Portfolio but we are stuck dead at $26,000 (virtual net) with 4 bearish positions remaining open. Our deadline for $50K was Jan 21st and it’s not looking good at the moment as this market simply goes up and up every day but I still have the nagging feeling that, the minute we capitulate, we’ll miss a beeline to $50K so it looks like we’ll stick it out over the weekend, although it’s only Tuesday so it may be too early to put on a brave face on bearish bets that clearly are not working at the moment.

It does seem to me that what’s going on with copper is a microcosm for what’s going on in the markets. The trading is very thin, the Chinese markets are selling off with the Shanghai down another 1.7% this morning and the Hang Seng off 1% as well. Nonetheless, with London closed and no real price check on the market, copper shot up a nickel to touch $4.31 overnight as the Dollar was knocked down from 80.7 to 78.9 – which used to be considered a major move in a currency but is now considered "Tuesday morning." It is truly amazing what you can get used to…

Somali Pirates (aka "Rent-A-Rebel") have seized an fuel tanker, also aiming to drive up oil prices during a thinly traded week (are you seeing a theme here?). Already the return of $3 gas prices has knocked 20% off the value of used SUVs in just one month, but I sure don’t feel sorry for the people who still have them – I was dumbfounded at how many SUVs were selling this year as truly my 6 month-old niece has more of an attention span than the American consumer, who can be burned over and over and over again by the same bad decisions, it seems. "It’s a challenge," says Adam Lee, president of the family-run Lee Auto Malls dealerships in Maine. "How do you tell a good customer, ‘You paid $32,000, and now it’s only worth $17,000?’" ROFL!!!

Indeed. Here is Doug Kass via Minyanville:

1. In line with consensus, the domestic economy experiences a strong first half, but several factors conspire to produce a weakening second half, which jeopardizes corporate profit growth forecasts.

2. Partisan politics cuts into business and consumer confidence and economic growth in the last half of 2011.

3. Rising commodities prices becomes the single greatest concern for the US stock market and economy. Scarcity of water boosts agricultural prices and causes a military confrontation between China and India. The continued effect of global warming, the resumption of swifter worldwide economic growth in 2011, normal population increases and an accelerated industrialization in emerging markets (and the associated water contamination and pollution that follows) contribute importantly to more droughts and the growing scarcity of water, forcing a continued and almost geometric rise in the price of agricultural commodities (which becomes one of the most important economic and stock market themes in 2011). Increased scarcity of water and higher agricultural commodity prices (corn, wheat, beans, etc) not only have broad economic consequences, but they become a destabilizing factor and serve as the basis for a developing powder keg in the relations between China and India.

4. The (stock) market moves sideways during 2011.

While the general consensus forecast is for a rise of about 10% to 15% for the S&P 500 in 2011, the index ends up exactly where it closes the year in 2010. A flat year is a fairly rare occurrence. Since 1900, there have only been six times when the averages recorded a year-over-year price change of less than 3% (plus or minus); 2011 will mark the seventh time.
5. Food and restaurant companies are among the worst performers in the S&P 500. (This surprise is an extension of surprise No. 3.) Several well-known multinational food companies and a host of domestic restaurant chains face margin and earnings pressures as they are unable to pass the violent rise in agricultural costs on to the consumer.

6. The shares of asset managers suffer. I expect a series of populist initiatives by the current administration beginning by a frontal assault on mutual fund 12b-1 fees.

7. Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton switch jobs by midyear 2011, 18 months before the 2012 Presidential election.


8. Speaker of the House John Boehner is replaced by Congressman Paul Ryan during the summer. A tearful Boehner proves too dogmatic.

9. A new political party emerges. Screwflation becomes a theme that has broadening economic social and political implications. Similar to its first cousin stagflation, screwflation is an expression of a period of slow and uneven economic growth, but, in addition, it holds the existence of inflationary consequences that have an outsized impact on a specific group.

10. The price of gold plummets by more than $250 an ounce in a four-week period in 2011 and is among the worst asset classes of the new year. The commodity experiences wild volatility in price (on five to 10 occasions, the price has a daily price change of at least $75), briefly trading under $1,050 an ounce during the year and ending the year between $1,100 and $1,200 an ounce.

11. Among the most notable takeover deals in 2011, Microsoft launches a tender offer for Yahoo at $21.50 a share. With the company in play, News Corporation (NWS) follows with a competing and higher bid. The private equity community joins the fray. Microsoft (MSFT) ultimately prevails and pays $24 a share for Yahoo (YHOO).

12. The Internet becomes the tactical nuke of the digital age. Cybercrime likely explodes exponentially as the Web is invaded by hackers. A specific target next year will be the NYSE, and I predict an attack that causes a week-long hiatus in trading and an abrupt slowdown in domestic business activity.

13. The SEC's insider trading case expands dramatically, reaching much further into the canyons of some of the largest hedge funds and mutual funds, and to several West Coast-based technology companies.

14. There is a peaceful regime change in Iran.

15. China overplays it's economic hand by implementing multiple tightening and by its unwillingness to allow its currency to appreciate. The region's GDP climbs by only 5% in 2011.


Doug Kass writes daily for RealMoney Silver, a premium bundle service from TheStreet.com.


Meanwhile, not to forget Motley Fool's Morgan Housel who thinks things will go from pillar to post around these particular areas of interest:

1. Municipal bonds; States are facing a $180 billion fiscal hole in 2011, and an additional $120 billion in 2012, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. States and localities face a long-term pension deficit of between $1.2 trillion and $3 trillion, depending on what discount rates you use. Property taxes -- a main source of revenue for local governments -- are falling and will continue to fall as property values are reassessed and real estate prices sag.

2. Rising interest rates; As grisly as the past three years have been on housing and employment, they've occurred against a backdrop of record-low interest rates -- a spectacular boon that's blunted the blow.

3. Oil: It was simple math: Gasoline prices rose from $2.29 to $4.05 between early 2007 and mid-2008. The U.S. consumed about 210 billion gallons of the stuff during that period. That's a $370 billion added tax on consumers.

With oil prices now breaching $90 a barrel -- almost 30% higher than a year ago -- a similar headwind is gaining momentum.

Should oil break above $100 a barrel, you get a two-for-one sting: Consumers are whacked by higher gas prices, and $100 breaks the psychological threshold of proving this country's energy policy is abysmal at best.

4. Mad man at the helm; Fed chairman Ben Bernanke has made it clear: He will keep interest rates ungodly low until the economy is out of the woods.

... the Fed is strictly concerned with price inflation, not asset inflation. Price inflation is when the price of goods like food goes up. Asset inflation is when there's a stock bubble. With the focus on the price of goods, assets can spin wildly out of control as the Fed looks the other way, insisting there's no inflation while bubbles form and inevitably burst. This is essentially what happened last decade with the housing bubble. Many think it's a story we're replaying line for line today.

5. Valuations; When the Fed prints money with abandon, there's a good chance the valuation of every financial asset will go nuts. Stocks. Bonds. Gold. Houses. Used cars. Everything gets distorted and becomes subject to bubblehood.

On one end, you have investors plowing into bonds, happy to buy the debt of governments, municipalities, and companies for returns that often round to zero. These investors won't be happy with the outcome. Just wait. At the other end, my colleague Alex Dumortier recently showed a few examples of irrational exuberance creeping back into the stock market, including what he found were high historical valuations, smart investors heading to the sidelines, and good ol' complacency.

The iron rule of investing is that there's a perfect negative correlation between returns and excitement. And there's a lot of excitement in almost every asset class these days.


Matthew Lynn @ Bloomberg:

No. 1. The bull market returns. Actually we’ve already been in a bull market for more than a year. Just take a look at the figures. But in the early stages of a rising equity cycle, no one says it’s a bull market. First they call it a dead-cat bounce. Then they call it a bear-market rally. By the end of 2011, the penny will have dropped. We’ll be officially back in bull territory.

No. 2. The alternative-investment industry crashes. The main driver of hedge funds and private-equity funds was the search for yield. With stock markets in the doldrums, interest rates cut to almost nothing, and bond yields at record lows, investors were desperate for any kind of meaningful return on their money. They were willing to listen to slick hedge-fund managers who promised to make 30 percent a year on high velocity yak-hide arbitrage. Next year, interest rates will be rising, and so will bond yield and equity returns.

No. 3. Venture capital returns. The start-up industry took a terrible beating from the dot-com crash. But as a rough rule, a decade is long enough for the financial markets to forget everything. .

No. 4. France gets smoked out in the euro crisis. Somehow France has managed to get itself grouped along with Germany as one of the strong euro nations. But it runs a bigger budget deficit than Italy. It has chronic unemployment and little growth. Crucially, it has the greatest resistance to reform.

No. 5. The Apple Inc. backlash starts. We used to think International Business Machines Corp. was sort of sinister. Then it was Microsoft Corp. But which business today has far too much power, is run by control freaks and puts profits before principles? That’s right. The world’s third-biggest company, measured by market value, is about to discover that the line between cool upstart and ugly monopolist is a very thin one.

No. 6. The German model is back in fashion. The words German and fashion go together about as well as Greece and solvent. But in a world trying to figure out how you get out of a debt crisis, the Rhineland model of capitalism is suddenly going to seem very appealing. Lots of mid-size companies, with huge technical expertise, low debt and skilled workforces exporting niche products to the whole world -- that sounds like a pretty good formula for success in the 2010s.

No. 7. Lloyds Banking Group Plc gets broken up.

No. 8. Iceland teaches the world a lesson. Two years ago, every government in the world bought into the idea that you had to bail out your banks. If they collapsed, you would go straight back to the Stone Age. One country defied the consensus. Iceland couldn’t afford to keep its banks going. What happened? There’s been pain, sure, but from next year on the economy should be growing again, inflation is under control and interest rates are coming down. If Iceland keeps recovering, only one conclusion is possible: You don’t need to bail out banks after all.

No. 9. Russia puts the R back in BRIC. We’ve heard a lot about the rising economic power of Brazil, India and China. A lot less has been heard about the R in the BRICs - - Russia. It tends to get dismissed as a raw materials supplier with an authoritarian government. But it’s trying to recreate itself as a technology powerhouse -- look at the plans to create a new Silicon Valley in the Moscow suburb of Skolkovo. Crazy? Remember, this was the first country to put a man into space.

No. 10. A backlash against Christmas e-cards.

(Matthew Lynn is a Bloomberg News columnist and the author of “Bust,” a book on the Greek debt crisis. The opinions expressed are his own.)

Estimable Dave Rosenberg opines by way of Automatic Earth:

1. In Barron’s look-ahead piece, not one strategist sees the prospect for a market decline. This is called group-think. Moreover, the percentage of brokerage house analysts and economists to raise their 2011 GDP forecasts has risen substantially. Out of 49 economists surveyed, 35 say the U.S. economy will outperform the already upwardly revised GDP forecasts, only 14 say we will underperform. This is capitulation of historical proportions.

2. The weekly fund flow data from the ICI showed not only massive outflows, but in aggregate, retail investors withdrew a RECORD net $8.6 billion from bond funds during the week ended December 15 (on top of the $1.7 billion of outflows in the prior week).

3. Investors Intelligence now shows the bull share heading up to 58.8% from 55.8% a week ago, and the bear share is up to 20.6% from 20.5%. So bullish sentiment has now reached a new high for the year and is now the highest since 2007 ? just ahead of the market slide.

4. It may pay to have a look at Dow 1929-1949 analog lined up with January 2000. We are getting very close to the May 1940 sell-off when Germany invaded France.

5. What about the S&P 500 dividend yield, and this comes courtesy of an old pal from Merrill Lynch who is currently an investment advisor. Over the course of 2010, numerous analysts were saying that people must own stocks because the dividend yields will be more than that of the 10-year Treasury. But alas, here we are today with the S&P 500 dividend yield at 2% and the 10-year T-note yield at 3.3%.

6. The equity market in gold terms has been plummeting for about a decade and will continue to do so. When measured in Federal Reserve Notes, the Dow has done great.

7. As Bob Farrell is clearly indicating in his work, momentum and market breadth have been lacking. The number of stocks in the S&P 500 that are making 52-week highs is declining even though the index continues to make new 52-week highs.

8. Stocks are overvalued at the present levels. For December, the Shiller P/E ratio says stocks are now trading at a whopping 22.7 times earnings! .

9. The potential for a significant down-leg in home prices is being underestimated. The unsold existing inventory is still 80% above the historical norm, at 3.7 million. And that does not include the ‘shadow’ foreclosed inventory. According to some superb research conducted by the Dallas Fed, completing the mean-reversion process would entail a further 23% decline in real home prices from here.

10. Arguably the most understated, yet significant, issue facing both U.S. economy and U.S. markets is the escalating fiscal strains at the state and local government levels, particularly those jurisdictions with uncomfortably high pension liabilities.


The estimable Bruce Krasting sticks his neck waaaaaaaaay out there and avoids predictions while writing an alternative narrative:

Oh boy is 2011 going to be an exciting year! Some things that I think might happen:

-Volatility is going up across the board. If you have the stomach for the swings that are coming across all markets there is a ton of money to be made; balls and timing are all that are necessary. The markets will create dozens of opportunities to make and lose.

-There will be 50 days with a swing in the S&P greater than 1%. There will be 10 days where gold swings $50. There will be two days with a drop greater than 100 bucks. Most of the big moves will be down moves. Bonds will not be spared the volatility.

-Gold will be higher a year from now but off its peak. At some time in the fall, gold will be near 1,800 and the New York Times will do a front-page story that gold is on its way to 2,000. That will be the high point of the year.

-Copper will continue to rise. This metal will benefit as the poor man’s gold. Why buy an ounce of something for $1,600 when you can have a whole pound of something else for only $5?

-The US bond market is in for a heck of a year. The 30-year will trade at BOTH 3% and 5%. Higher rates will come early in the year, then the deflation trade will come back into vogue.

-Spain will be the next sovereign debtor that falls prey to the market. This will happen before the end of the 1st Q. The package to bail them out will exceed $500b. This will exhaust the EU resources.

-The IMF will contribute $125b to the Spanish bailout. The US portion of this will be $25b. Republican Senators and Congressman go nuts. The American people will side with them.

-The ECB will be forced to issue bonds that are joint and several debt of the EU members. This development will stabilize the EU temporarily, but it will be hated in Germany. The amount of the new issuance of these bonds will be small. The program will be terminated in 2012.

-The dollar versus the Euro will be all over the lot. The low for EURUSD will be ~1.17. The really big surprise is that toward the end of the year the Euro will be pushing 1.50.

-The CHF (Swiss franc) will be like copper. It will attract investors as there is no good alternative. Before June EURCHF will trade below 90.

-The market will finally wake up to the fact that the YEN is not a good store of wealth. The continuing argument will be, “Yeah the Yen stinks, but everything is worse so it should be okay”. Wrong. The Yen is a short.

-The US will have a full year deficit of 1.4 trillion dollars. This depressing reality will hang on the US economy/markets.

-QE2 will be the last QE we see. The program will end (on schedule) on 6/30. Perversely, long-term interest rates will rise as long as QE continues. When the program is finished rates will begin a rapid decline. .

-The high for the S&P will occur before June. The S&P will fall short of 1,500. The low will be 1,100.

-Oil will rise to $130 in the next six months. It will be above $100 at the end of the year.

-China’s inflation rate will continue to rise. Food will be the primary driver. The central government will respond with monetary tightening and an acceleration of the Yuan appreciation. It will not work. Inflation will push 7%.

-Brazil will continue to shine as a resource rich country that runs a trade surplus and has low budget deficits. The surprise of the year will be Argentina. Food will be the reason.

-The US will wind down its presence in Iraq. With every step we take out the door domestic violence will rise. Iran will assume a larger roll in the south (Basra). This will not go over well with the US.

-Kim Jong-Il will die. His son will take over. The heir is a nut, there will be more military exercises that results in shells landing on S. Korea soil. China will make public statements that it is trying to bring order; behind the scenes they will be applauding the chaos.

-Obama’s popularity will continue to fall. The legislative “successes” at the end of 2010 will convert to a series of failures. There will be no new stimulus. Portions of the health care legislation will be dialed back.

-Obama will propose a means test for Social Security in his State of the Union Address. Retirees who are living the high-life (Warren Buffet types) are going to have their SS checks cut to the bone.

-The 2% reduction on worker contributions to Social Security will be extended and expanded to 3% for 2012. Rates will not go up in future years. Social Security will have to be gutted as a result.

-2011 will be a stock pickers market. Index investing will see a bad year. Some of the darlings of 2011 like AAPL and NFLX will not fare so well.

-There will be at least three more 'Flash Crashes'. The SEC will launch another investigation into how this could happen. The conclusion will be that ETF's and how dealers manage them are responsible for the liquidity problems in individual stock names. There is no solution to this problem. The market will be on edge looking for the next mini crash.

-Meredith Whitney will be proven wrong in her forecast that 50-100 munis go chapter 9 this year. The process to insolvency takes much longer than she has anticipated. Only 11 munis will make a chapter filing. The rest will be pushed to the brink in 2012.

-The center of attention will move away from California as the most bankrupt state. In his State of the State address in January, New York’s new Governor Andrew Cuomo will fess up to the fact that for the past year of so NY has been burying its problems.

-Unemployment will not go down. The average for the year will be above 10%. The number of workers who leave the system will rise to 20mm. These workers will find part-time jobs that pay cash. The new day-workers will compete will illegals for employment. Social tensions will be the result.

-The Chevy volt will not sell well. Boeing will be unable to complete a single Dreamliner. GM will trade below $30, Boeing will hit the low $50’s.

-The Singapore dollar will be the strongest currency on the globe in 2011.

-Apple will not come up with a new product this coming year. The rest of the consumer tech manufacturers will gain some market share.

-Headline inflation will rise a bit. It will push through 2%. Those numbers are meaningless.

-Much to my chagrin and surprise Tim Geithner will not be replaced as Treasury Secretary. He will continue to do a very mediocre job for us. He will be replaced in January of 2012.

-Comcast will complete the acquisition of NBC/CNBC. One of the first acts will be to fire Mark Haines. Nothing will help.

There will be violent weather episodes all over the globe. The La Nina condition that is now dominating global weather is the strongest in 50 years.

-Fannie and Freddie will be merged. Out of the ashes will come a good bank and a bad bank. The bad bank will hold 2.5 trillion of questionable mortgages.

-Washington's other mortgage lender FHA will run into troubles.

-There will not be a failure of a government bond auction. But the coverage for each issuance will grow smaller. China, Russia and Brazil will reduce their holdings of US reserves.

-Mortgage Gate will die as a headline story.

-The narco violence in Mexico will expand to many more cities. Tourism will be hurt as a result. Some of the violence will pass over our border. Anti immigration attitudes will expand. Because the low-end economy will remain in the dumpster the actual number of illegal aliens will decline by more than 1mm. This will add to the RE woes in some US areas. It will stress the countries that they originated from as $ remittances decline.

-Interest rates will be higher throughout the year for corporate bonds and Munis. This will bring a reversal of the mania to buy dividend stocks. Those who thought that this investment strategy would work for them will be disappointed.

-Jon Hilsenrath will write an article for the Wall Street Journal that is actually critical of the Fed. The unpopularity of the Fed will rise to such a level that Jon will have no choice but to follow suit.

-The Fed will come under attack from all sides. They are truly in a no-win situation. Unemployment will continue to rise while inflation rises and the dollar declines.

-ZIRP will be with us for yet another year. Bernanke will not let go of this loser policy.

-Social unrest will become visible in America in 2011. There will be demonstrations in many major cities. Some will turn violent.

Have a great year!!


Sez Nouriel Roubini:


The US:

Roubini Global Economics expects gross domestic economic growth of 2.7pc, down from its estimate of 2.8pc for this year. Inflation will remain muted at 1.4pc compared with 1.6pc for this year. The growth, a sharp contrast to the 2.4pc contraction of 2009, won't be enough to bring down unemployment, though. Roubini is forecasting it stays around 9.5pc. Even if the US economy could deliver growth of 4pc, it would still need half a decade of that to cut unemployment closer to 5pc, his firm reckons. Roubini is also not optimistic that there will be any agreement in Congress over the next two years on how to tackle the country's deficit. Unless bond investors force the issue, that will be a job for whoever wins the next presidential election, he says.

The Eurozone:

It's in the eurozone that the greatest risks to global growth lie, according to Roubini. What he characterises as a "muddle-through" approach is not sustainable and more countries will eventually have to restructure their debts, he reckons. Despite a forecast that the German economy will slow to growth of 2.2pc in 2011 from an estimated 3.5pc this year, the pressure will grow on Europe's largest economy to adopt a very stimulative fiscal policy to compensate for the weakness of many of its eurozone neighbours. Europe's second-tier of heavyweights - France and Italy - will grow just 1.3pc and 0.8pc respectively, according to Roubini.

Asia:

Tensions between the region and the US will remain over currency policy. Roubini doesn't expect any significant devaluation of the yuan by China. That, in turn, will encourage other Asian exporters, such as South Korea, to keep their currencies weak because no one wants to lose market share. Roubini expects Chinese gross domestic product to slow to 8.7pc next year from the 10pc he has pencilled in this year. At 8.8pc India's growth will almost match the 9pc enjoyed this year. However, all the major emerging economies face a tough battle against inflation as a combination of their own internal growth and the liquidity unleashed by the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing drives up prices.


Here's some tidbits from Jim Hansen of Ravenna Capital Management. You have to sign up for this:

More brave souls willing to predict the price of oil.

In an article last week titled “Chart Watchers See a Crude Reawakening” the Wall Street Journal had these brave calls on the price of oil for next year.

“Mr. Ross said he wouldn't be surprised to see $100 oil in 2011. The $103 level will face significant resistance, he said, because it represents a 61.8% Fibonnaci retracement from the 2008 peak to trough. Fibonacci followers note that until a market retraces more than 61.8% of the previous decline, it is still governed by that downtrend. But shooting higher than $103 would imply that oil has entered a new primary uptrend.

Other technicians are even more bullish. Mary Ann Bartels, technical research analyst at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said in a note to clients earlier this week that crude oil could surge to $118 to $120 a barrel in 2011.” WSJ 2010-12-22

“Fibonacci followers…”? Sounds like a new religion and given how most people invest it probably is. The $118 to $120 a barrel range in 2011 is a little more gutsy call than $103/barrel.

If that $120 level is reached hold on to your investing hats because that is well above the 4-5% of GDP level that experts like Steven Kopits have said historically induces recessions.

Now you would think the former president of a major oil company would know better than to predict price but it appears not. “The former president of Shell Oil, John Hofmeister, says Americans could be paying $5 for a gallon of gasoline by 2012.” Since that would add another $2/gallon to the current price it would take approximately $750 million (3/4 of a billion) more out of the U.S. economy per day than the current $3/gallon average price. That can best be described as an anti stimulus program.

“The price of fuel is up 13.6% from last December and 76% higher from December 2008, according to a new study from the Oil Price Information Service.” The report also indicated that households in Montana and Mississippi will be paying more than 12% of income for gasoline in December. It is a long drive to the nearest Wal-Mart so that will hurt.

But even more important is that if gasoline does climb to $5/gallon diesel fuel (remember diesel sells at premium to gasoline), heating oil and importantly for the airline industry jet fuel will have also climbed to equivalent levels. The resulting economic pain will run much deeper than just the $750 million in additional gasoline costs. It will easily be a $1 billion per day tax on the U.S. economy and this is a tax increase neither the President nor Congress can repeal.

Send an email to: jim.hansen-at-kmsfinancial.com and put 'subscribe' on the subject line. You won't regret it!

This collection is from ASPO USA:

–Arthur Berman, petroleum geologist and board member of ASPO-USA predicts:

I believe that oil prices in the US will average $88-92 a barrel in 2011 but may climb toward $100 by the end of the year, while natural gas prices in the US will average $4.00-4.25 in 2011 but may climb toward $5.00 by the end of the year. I believe that much of the “shale gale” euphoria will begin to unravel in 2011 and there may be some important distress situations or even bankruptcies that will underscore the risk of these ventures. I suspect that the rush to “liquids-rich” gas plays in the US will be exposed as low-resource potential ventures rather than another Saudi Arabia of crude oil. I imagine that the miracle of Chinese growth will begin to show some weakness in 2011 as state-directed economics becomes unstable. The PBC has been artificially keeping inflation low by buying dollars and creating bonds to keep the money supply low. The loans for big infrastructure projects will not uniformly perform. This cannot last. True inflation is higher than revealed and, when it is known, will show the vulnerability of the economy because the rural sector is not sharing prosperity with the urban sector. Sovereign debt problems in Europe will continue to create instability in the global economy. The EU concept is flawed because a single currency does not allow weak economies to devalue their currency.

– Gail Tverberg, actuary and writer, is editor of The Oil Drum sez:

I expect 2011 will be a year of recession and increasing layoffs. It may start off reasonably well, but then an attempted price rise of oil to, say, $120 barrel, will prove to be too much for most economies. There will be countries and smaller political subdivisions (state, city) that take steps to restructure their debt with longer maturities. All of this will drive interest rates up, and make credit harder to find. The recession will worsen as credit contraction ensues. Governments will scramble to try to keep each other and banks from failing. In some cases they will be successful; in other cases they will not be.

– Lindsay Curren is editor of Transition Voice, the magazine covering peak oil, climate change, economic crisis and the Transition movement response. She sez:

The US will fail to produce a meaningful energy policy even as energy is increasingly understood by the people as a key input, the cost of which threatens to cripple family economies. As federal and political solutions fail further, the economy continues to limp along, with more and more folks out of work, causing severe local and state cutbacks and even state and municipal bankruptcies. And this gets to the crux of the cultural shift that I see. Increasingly unemployed people will hobble social services, exposing a culture in clear decline with no plan to address it. The federal government and centralized business will have less and less relevance. In response, the unemployed and underemployed “underclass” will either take re-localization to the next level, getting very creative and energized as they craft compelling and imaginative yet practical local solutions including bartering, more local currencies, more mass transit and carpooling usage, organic community building, more food production, and simpler local living. But the will has to be there even as we feel exhausted and unsure and resources are limited.

– Ilargi, The Automatic Earth (and Nicole Foss at a remove) say:

I’ll now venture to name 2011 The Year of the Stone that Grinds the Family Jewels. Well, either that, or, as my writing partner Stoneleigh phrases it: The Year of The Margin Call. We can extend and pretend only so long. We can hand over only so many years of the people’s future earnings to the banks. That is, before someone becomes suspicious of what we do. The realization that there is simply no way we can pay down our debts, whether we’re in Ireland, California or Japan, will dawn in 2011, no matter what stories are spun in capital cities and TV studios. It’s high time to get out of the way of the wave that’s-a-gonna-be-a-comin’, and no, timing the market is NOT the main concern, even as finance types would have you believe it is. It’s getting out of the way of the wave that should be your main concern.

– Charles A. Hall and David J. Murphy. Professor Hall is a systems ecologist at SUNY-ESF, an affiliate of Syracuse University. Murphy is a graduate student in environmental science and a contributor to The Oil Drum.

We predict (with relatively little certainty assigned to it) that there will continue to be (for a while) a mild economic recovery, which will increase the demand for oil, and thus require the increased use of higher-priced oil. This will eventually require that 10 percent or so of the US GDP will go to the price of energy, which, as in the past, will lead to an economic downturn which will lead, in time, into the same cycle again. While we are not sure of the details of timing or prices we think that Jean Laherrere’s and Colin Campbell’s concept of the “undulating plateau” will continue to describe the US (and European) economies for the forseeable future - at least until serious peak oil and declining EROI kicks in.

– Tom Whipple is editor of Peak Oil Review.

It looks to me as if the coal/power shortage in China is continuing to spread and will get much worse in the next two months. Beijing’s only possible short-term response is to import as much more energy in the form of oil, coal, and natural gas as they can, thus driving the oil prices above $100 a barrel in the next few months. The Wall Street consensus that China’s oil imports will fall to a 6 percent increase this year seems much too low when you factor in the need to grow at 8-10 percent, replenish stocks, build a strategic reserve, and cope with the growing coal shortage. The likelihood that we will see another 2008 type oil price spike in the next six months seems to be growing every day.

– Christine Patton is co-chair of Transition OKC and author of the Peak Oil Hausfrau Blog.

Not only have American social networks become sadly deteriorated, but so have the skills needed to support them: the fundamental ability to build and maintain the healthy long-term relationships that are critical for community success. Just like planting a garden or cooking from scratch, these skills have to be learned and practiced, and they have to work well in order for coalescing community groups to stay together rather than fall apart. In 2011, community facilitators will increase their focus on helping groups of people simply learn how to get along.

– Ron Swenson, ASPO-USA Board of Directors has this prediction:

Solar: Solar manufacturer shipments more than doubled from 2009 to 2010. I predict that world production of solar energy systems will double again this coming year. A quarter of the growth will come from PV (photovoltaics) and the balance of growth will come from large solar thermal electric projects being installed in the US southwest and other parts of the world. Oil: As a consequence of the drilling moratorium imposed by the Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Horizon disaster, the USA will experience oil shortages in 2011 or 2012. (A steady supply from the Gulf has been dependent on new wells filling in as production from older wells declines.) Thoughts of seeking satisfaction of market demand from sources more remote than the Gulf must take into account the longer trip time that would be required for oil tankers. Lacking excess capacity, the global tanker fleet is unlikely to be able to respond, even if other oil suppliers (Africa, Middle East) could be imagined to increase their production.

– Bart Anderson, teacher, journalist and technical writer, is co-editor of Energy Bulletin and active in Transition Palo Alto sez:

I’m looking at two things for 2011. 1) If the WikiLeaks phenomenon grows, we will see the release of documents that confirm what we have been saying about energy shortfalls, corporate domination of governments, and foreign policies aimed at control of resources. 2) There will be continued government cutbacks in pensions and social services in industrialized countries, such as the US, UK, Ireland, Spain and Greece. In France this year, millions demonstrated and went on strike. Popular protests such as these could change the political landscape.

– Richard Heinberg, author of The Party’s Over, Blackout and Peak Everything sez:

I hate making predictions. The world situation is so complex now with demand and supply factors going all directions short-term, so that even if we know the long-term trend (depletion and decline) it’s really hard to make a meaningful one-year forecast. Okay, so, that said, here’s a shot in the dark: Asia-Pacific coal prices will rise at least 20 percent from their current level during 2011.

– Estimable Jeffrey J. Brown, independent petroleum geologist sez:

No matter what specific years that one picks as the starting and ending points, the period from the late Nineties to the end of this decade was characterized by a double-digit average long-term rate of increase in average annual oil prices. For example, from 1998 to 2008 the average rate of increase in US spot crude oil prices was about 20 percent per year. However, what I find interesting is the progression in three year-over-year annual price declines in the 1997 to 2009 time period: down to $14 in 1998, down to $26 in 2001 and down to $62 in 2009. Note that each successive year-over-year price decline was to a level that was about twice the level reached during the prior decline. If this pattern holds, the next year-over-year price decline would bring us down to an average annual oil price of about $120, in the context of a long-term average double-digit rate of increase in annual oil prices, which is what we are seeing in 2010, versus 2009.

– Raymond De Young, associate professor of environmental psychology and planning, University of Michigan sez:

Rob Hopkins’s application of Alexander’s -A Pattern Language‖ to Transition Town initiatives will be accepted as a coherent way to organize and disseminate the emerging insights from the many small experiments being conducted. As an -open source‖ framework, this language will grow organically. Far-reaching ideas (e.g., sacredness as an essential and central feature of all community transitions, Brownlee, 7 Nov 2010), once tested and found true and useful, become new patterns for practitioners to consider for adoption in their community.

– John Michael Greer, author of The Long Descent and The Ecotechnic Future sez:

Washington DC, 15 December 2011: The blue-ribbon panel of economists tasked by the White House with finding the cause of this spring’s record-breaking spike in oil prices has just released its preliminary report. The panel, chaired by former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan, dismissed the suggestion that “peak oil” was responsible for the runup in prices, which briefly saw petroleum at $233 a barrel. The report states instead that speculation was to blame, and credited prompt action by the administration for the subsequent plunge in prices that brought prices back down to today’s price of $68 a barrel, a new low for the year. In other news, a White House spokesman angrily rejected claims that this summer’s stock market crash had anything to do with the price of oil, and insisted that it would have only a minor impact on the nation’s economy…

– Debbie Cook is president of the board of Post-Carbon Institute and former mayor of Huntington Beach, CA. sez:

When the witches of Delaware attempt to cast their spell on big-ag ethanol subsidies, the wizards of ADM will exorcise the Tea Party from energy politics. Put another way, corporate America will turn momma grizzlies into teddy bears.

– Sharon Astyk, ASPO-USA Board of Directors, author of Depletion and Abundance and Independence Days

There is every reason to believe that we will see a food-price run-up similar to the one in 2008 in the coming year, making absolutely clear exactly how tightly food and energy prices are intertwined. Although the number of the world’s malnourished briefly fell below 1 billion this year, the number will rise again above it.

– Tad Patzek, chair of the Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin sez:

To arrive at my most important predictions for 2011, I have attempted to be insanely optimistic and skip the usual peak-everything stuff. The Happy New Year of 2011 will see a thorough public discussion of what needs to be done to make the US a more resilient society and economy. The federal government and Congress will start working together on the development of a massive national electrified railroad system to transport goods and people. We will come off our high horse and stop hallucinating about building bullet-train tracks in a railroad system that is decidedly mid-twentieth century or earlier. Many cities across the US will embark on the crash investment in light rail and other alternatives to cars.

Subsidies for corn, soybean, wheat and rice will be repealed and replaced with a thoughtful program of developing a robust, distributed system to produce a wide variety of healthy whole foods for all. The administration and Congress will wake up to the fact that an unhealthy, obese and generally uneducated population will require an insanely expensive healthcare system that will fail if the root causes of poor health are not eliminated.

Our schools will hire science teachers who live the practice and theory of science, not merely the theory of teaching. Many families across the US will dump game stations, idiotic TV, and iPhones in exchange for conversations and books. Neighborhoods will again become centers of civic activity and common thinking. We will occasionally stop and talk to the homeless, instead of giving them a dollar or a dirty look. Economists will discover that the Earth is spherical and finite, not an infinite mathematical plane with infinitely substitutable resources. Those of us who have animals and children will pet both and smile. Republicans will occasionally talk to the rest of us, and we will respond with kindness.


Right!

What is happening under our noses is the emergence of the idea of 'resources' in an economic gestalt that has not felt a need to recognize it before. This itself has a cost that has not been budgeted that must be added to the cost emerging of the resources themselves. We now become 'hardware' rather than software people. This is an idea that doesn't currently exist in 21st century America with its scaffolds of entitlements. What is desired above all other things is a paradigm that can put a value on resources that the establishment can profitably live with, which is an impossible contradiction to resolve.

Another 'meme of the now' is the collapse of the post- Andy Warhol fashion universe of 'fab' and 'trend' that goes nowhere and provides nothing but a useless distraction. It has heretofore written the roles that all must play. Unfortunately, the unattractive 'unemployed' and 'foreclosed upon' and the 'living in despair' roles are becoming corrosive to all the rest: the 'fab' roles that basically pimp more and more waste. We cannot waste anymore and must figure out a way to be serious rather than flippant. The upshot is a new kind of politics that is more serious, which is turning from the Warhol model of empty- suit fronts for business interests.

Things matter now.

The new trend is ruin and poverty. How does one make that anything other than what it is, something deadly serious as a heart attack. Accompanying ruin is creeping repudiation of obligations. This may or may not gain traction in 2011 but the gravitational attraction that walking away exerts will pull in all directions, perhaps in Ireland first but what happens next?

Along with the ghost of Warhol goes the shades of Ayn Rand and the self- rationalizing neo- liberals. If any group deserves its onrushing discredit, it is this one. The denouement is all that is lacking but their doom is linked to the flippancy behind which they can pose. Whether this year or another is the end for them the outcome is inevitable. Bernanke is their champion; everything done in his name for the benefit of his neo- lib, wiseguy friends has been lost to the run- up in crude prices and decline in bonds.

After Bernanke comes who ... or what, exactly? This is where finance creeps right at the lip of the abyss, talking the 'recovery' talk but shitting in their pants.

Nothing lasts forever and the shock of mondernist 'new' has grown old and moldy. Modernity reeks of failure, whether it is hyperinflating China, the rotting Phoenix and Las Vegas suburbs or in the canyons of lower Manhattan. The surprise is that modernistas are still hanging around but one can almost feel the nervous sweat that accumulates around the collective collar as the noose tightens.

Monday, December 27, 2010

Krugman Makes Mistake, Refers To 'Peak Oil' in the Times ...

Paul Krugman, the Keynesian economist everyone loves to hate because he advocates giving away money nobody has dropped the 'PO bomb and done so in the august pages of the New York Times'. You're fired, Krugman:

In particular, today, as in 2007-2008, the primary driving force behind rising commodity prices isn’t demand from the United States. It’s demand from China and other emerging economies. As more and more people in formerly poor nations are entering the global middle class, they’re beginning to drive cars and eat meat, placing growing pressure on world oil and food supplies.

And those supplies aren’t keeping pace. Conventional oil production has been flat for four years; in that sense, at least, peak oil has arrived. True, alternative sources, like oil from Canada’s tar sands, have continued to grow. But these alternative sources come at relatively high cost, both monetary and environmental.

Also, over the past year, extreme weather — especially severe heat and drought in some important agricultural regions — played an important role in driving up food prices. And, yes, there’s every reason to believe that climate change is making such weather episodes more common.

So what are the implications of the recent rise in commodity prices? It is, as I said, a sign that we’re living in a finite world, one in which resource constraints are becoming increasingly binding. This won’t bring an end to economic growth, let alone a descent into Mad Max-style collapse. It will require that we gradually change the way we live, adapting our economy and our lifestyles to the reality of more expensive resources.


More expensive resources means what, exactly? Resources that are expensive enough to keep them in the ground and out of the grasp of 'industry' means a Mad Max collapse. Expensive to the point of some trifling inconvenience to anyone other than economic 'losers' such as the Welfare Queenish unemployed is clearly not expensive enough. What is needed is the destruction of demand! Anything less is pointless, right Professor Krugman?

This is the dilemma that the establishment has created for itself by wasting its irreplaceable natural capital and calling the outcome 'progress'. Our dilemma strands us. We require the comforting illusions that modernity provides of our 'dominance' of the natural world even as the exercise of that dominance undermines the modernity itself. The 'change' Krugman refers to is a parade of rear guard actions designed to keep catastrophe at bay.

High oil prices spill over into other goods and services that embed fuel or require it to get to a market of some kind. High prices reduce the supply of customers, which manifests as declines in the amount of business which in turn means less funds to service debts or keep governments solvent.

Grasping for the 'more' alternative is not confidence building. Also not confidence building is the Establishment denial of the Peak Oil subject. This suggests the Establishment is impotent or cowardly or both. Sez Rick Munroe @ The Energy Bulletin:


Liquid Fuel Emergency (LFE) planning is not a priority

As the Leotta team points out, “preparedness for oil/fuel disruptions isn’t one of those [most pressing] issues” for local and state government agencies. Furthermore, it’s not a priority at the federal level, either. Examination of the priority lists at Public Safety Canada and DHS give no indication of concern over future oil supply, nor of any attention to LFE planning. To their credit, both agencies have a clear focus on the protection of critical infrastructure, but there is no comparable concern over what’s inside the pipelines: the supply of oil and gas itself.

Another reason why LFE planning is not on the radar of emergency planners is the widespread unawareness of the evidence regarding oil supply. It is still rare to encounter an emergency planner (at any level) who is already familiar with the term, “peak oil” or the literature on oil supply security (eg. the Hirsch Report, warnings regarding export capacity and a near-term supply crunch, the Oil Shockwave exercise, military analyses of peak oil, recent statements from the International Energy Agency, etc.).

“All hands on deck”


Both Alan Smart in Australia and Kathy Leotta in her earlier study have stressed the importance of pre-planning for an LFE, as did the GAO in its analyses. The Leotta team is correct in stating, “It will be ‘all hands on deck’ when a crisis occurs or is imminent” and in warning that “some period of confusion and scrambling” appears likely. The supply of affordable fuel is so essential to our economy and our security that a major LFE could present emergency planners and civic leaders with a problem of unprecedented complexity, scale and risk to social order. The Oil Shockwave exercise (June, 2005) concluded that a 4% reduction in global oil supply could lead to a near-tripling of oil prices, and that effective government responses were very limited. Shockwave participant (and current Department of Defense chief) Robert Gates warned, “The threat is real and urgent, requiring immediate and sustained attention at the highest levels of government.”

Half a decade later, Gates’ warning remains largely unobserved despite the mounting evidence of impending oil supply difficulties. Here in North America, we have instead sustained inattention at all levels of government, a situation which in turn is sustained by the unwillingness of mainstream media to examine the evidence and present it to citizens.


I'll leave it up to the reader to come to his or her own conclusions about 'Mad Max'. Real progress will only begin with embracing the concept of 'Less'. What happens after supply disruptions begin escapes analysis. The supply- side obsession of American- style policy makers would suggest a no- holds- barred drilling regime with the vegetable garden @ the White House ripped out and replaced with an oil- drilling rig. Then what? More leaning on Canadians and military aggression around the world to feed the SUVs! This would have the White House drilling rig on one side and a missile aimed @ Caracas on the other.

Meanwhile there are a raft of 2011 prognoses @ Energy Bulletin of which this one by Ron Swenson from ASPO catches the eye:

Solar: Solar manufacturer shipments more than doubled from 2009 to 2010. I predict that world production of solar energy systems will double again this coming year. A quarter of the growth will come from PV (photovoltaics) and the balance of growth will come from large solar thermal electric projects being installed in the US southwest and other parts of the world. Oil: As a consequence of the drilling moratorium imposed by the Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Horizon disaster, the USA will experience oil shortages in 2011 or 2012. (A steady supply from the Gulf has been dependent on new wells filling in as production from older wells declines.) Thoughts of seeking satisfaction of market demand from sources more remote than the Gulf must take into account the longer trip time that would be required for oil tankers. Lacking excess capacity, the global tanker fleet is unlikely to be able to respond, even if other oil suppliers (Africa, Middle East) could be imagined to increase their production.

– Ron Swenson, ASPO-USA Board of Directors


It's been a theme here @ Economic Undertow that shortages would be the consequence of unaffordable rather than unobtainable fuels. Our booming 'poverty' industry makes it likely that shortages that appear will be persistent. This creates the worst of all worlds as modernity- driven resource consumption continues unabated in the face of shortages while alternative approaches to employing workers and creating output is starved of capital. I don't know right this minute how our fabulous so- called policy making apparatus is going to escape this particular trap- slash- vicious cycle.

As for 2011 predictions: the hardest thing is not so much making predictions but accurately noting what is taking place at the moment right under our feet. It is amazing how much is missed!

For instance, we are already in the post- peak world of less and less oil available AT AN AFFORDABLE PRICE. The price matters! Dollar- for- dollar, peak oil took place in 1998 when the yearly average barrel price was $14! We have been pricing our fuel waste 'system' into receivership for over ten years. No wonder our economies are having the bends!

Price a rationing tool which measures credit at the same time. @ + $90 the world has credit that it can free up so that fuel can be rationed to those who can borrow and bid.

The trend is shifting away from credit availability. The price that will matter is the 'cash price' not just of fuel but everything else. It is this ongoing destruction/repudiation of credit toward a preference for cash that is the large trend that carries from 2010 to 2011 and beyond.

This is what makes Swenson's prediction/observation so troubling. When rationing by credit/price ends the rationing will be by physical availability. In given areas, there will be no fuel available regardless of price or how much money or credit customers have in their pockets.

You can have a thousand dollars in cash in your jeans but if there is no gas in the gas stations in your state you won't go anywhere unless you walk. The next step may be no food in the supermarkets which is the troubling part, the part that Munroe tasks the establishment with ignoring.

Right now is the peak of 'emergency credit': bailout funds from central banks, super- sovereigns, from foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives directed toward the lending/credit market that becomes more impaired by the minute. The Federal Reserve has according to some source or other been able to replace the credit evaporated in the shadow banking system since the failure of Lehman Brothers. What of it? What can the Fed do next? Can it create new customers who will take on new good loans? Can the Fed 'print' new products or good collateral to borrow against? What of the 'assets' that fall worthless tomorrow? The Fed has accepted a stupid and pointless task. More emergency credit solves nothing, the economic system built on endless waste of a finite good is now obviously insolvent. This insolvency will become more and more visible during the upcoming year.

Unaffordable fuel means all the depend on it is also unaffordable. This fact will be denied for as long as possible guaranteeing the insolvencies that emerge will be intractable, that final ruin will be total.

That ruin will be total, what a legacy we supposed wisest of apes leave to our children!

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Waiting for the Other Shoe To Drop ...


Merry Christmas! Here is John Hussman:


4) We did not avoid a second Great Depression because we bailed out financial institutions. Rather, the collapse in the economy and the surge in unemployment were the direct result of a gaping hole in the U.S. regulatory structure that prevented the rapid restructuring of insolvent non-bank financials. Policy makers then inappropriately extended the "too big to fail" doctrine to ordinary banks. Following a striking loss of public confidence that resulted from arbitrary policy responses, coupled with fear-mongering by exactly those who stood to benefit from public handouts, the self-fulfilling crisis was contained by a change in accounting rules that effectively disabled capital requirements for all financial companies. We are now left with a Ponzi scheme. 

While it's clear that the four-second tape in Ben Bernanke's head is an endless loop saying "We let the banks fail in the Great Depression, and look what happened," any disruption caused by the "failure" of a financial institution is not due to financial losses to bondholders, but is instead due to the necessity of liquidating the assets in a disorganized, piecemeal way, as was the case with Lehman Brothers. Large, sometimes major banks fail every year without a material effect on the economy. The key is to have regulations that allow these failures to occur with the minimal amount of disruptive liquidation.

It is important to recognize that nearly every financial institution has enough debt to its own bondholders on the balance sheet to absorb all of its losses without any damage to depositors or customers. These bondholders lend at a spread, and they knowingly take a risk.

Bank regulations intelligently allow the FDIC to cut away the "operating" portion of a financial institution from the obligations to its bondholders and stockholders. Consider a bank with $100 billion of assets, against which it owes $60 billion of customer deposits, $30 billion of debt to its own bondholders, and $10 billion in shareholder equity. Now suppose those assets decline in value to just $80 billion, creating an insolvent institution ($80 billion in assets, $60 billion in deposit liabilities, $30 billion in debt to bondholders, and -$10 billion in equity). The "operating portion" is the $80 billion in assets, along with the $60 billion of customer deposits, which can be sold as a "whole bank" transaction for $20 billion to another institution. The stockholders are wiped out, while the bondholders get the $20 billion residual and take a loss on the rest. Depositors and customers now get statements with a different logo at the top. The seamless "failure" of Washington Mutual is a good example of this in action (the emphasis in mine). 

The problem with Bear Stearns and Lehman was that no equivalent set of regulations was in place to allow "cutting away" the operating portion of a non-bank institution. Instead, the Fed illegally expanded the definition of the word "discount" in Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act and created a shell company to buy $30 billion of Bear Stearns' questionable long-term assets without recourse. The remaining entity was sold to JP Morgan, where Bear Stearns bondholders still stand to get 100 cents on the dollar plus interest. Lehman was allowed to "fail," but because there was still no set of regulations that allowed cutting away the operating entity, it had to be liquidated piecemeal.

Importantly, and even urgently, it was not this "failure" that produced the economic downturn. If you carefully observe what happened in 2008, the large-scale collapse of the financial markets and the U.S. economy started literally sixty seconds after TARP was passed by Congress on October 3, 2008. At that moment, the world was told not that the smooth operation of the global financial system would be ensured by taking receivership of failing financial institutions; not that the focus of policy would be the protection of depositors, customers, and U.S. fiscal stability; but instead that insolvent private balance sheets would now be defended, subject to the arbitrary decisions of policy makers in which nobody had confidence. Lehman's failure simply told investors that these decisions could be completely arbitrary, since there was really no operative distinction between Bear Stearns, which was saved, and Lehman, which was not. Moreover, in order to pass TARP, the public had to be convinced that a global meltdown would result if financial institutions weren't preserved in their existing form. In this way, policy makers created a crisis of confidence.

Skip forward and carefully observe what happened in 2009, and you'll see that the crisis was suspended once the FASB threw out rules requiring financial companies to report their assets at market value, while at the same time, the Federal Reserve illegally broadened the definition of "government agency" in Section 14(b) of the Federal Reserve Act in order to purchase $1.5 trillion of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac obligations. These actions replaced the arbitrary discretion of policy makers with confidence that no major institution would be at risk of failing because, in effect, meaningful capital standards would no longer apply.

Thus, our policy makers first created a crisis of confidence, and then resolved it by legalizing a global Ponzi scheme.

Or rather, the Bernanke Money Laundry which allows finance 'friends' of the Chairman to swap their used toilet paper for cash. The friends use Fed liquidity to pump up markets allowing the same friends to sell into these rising markets on an ongoing basis. Sez Hussman:

As David Einhorn at Greenlight Capital has noted, "We learned the wrong lesson." We should have learned that existing capital standards were insufficient and that there was a large, gaping hole in our regulatory structure that failed to provide "resolution authority" for non-bank financial companies. Instead, we've learned the dangerously misguided notion that some institutions are simply too big to fail. This inevitably creates a situation where reckless misallocation of capital continues to be subsidized at increasing public cost, while bondholders go unscathed and insiders take bonuses with the same alacrity as Bernie Madoff's early investors.

In short, the downturn in the real economy occurred because regulators refused to take receivership of insolvent institutions, while pushing a story line that the entire global economy would crumble if bondholders had to take losses. This created a fear among depositors and consumers that the entire system was arbitrary and unstable, fueled periodic runs on various financial institutions, tightened the availability of credit to companies having nothing to do with real estate, and created a self-fulfilling prophecy of global economic weakness. Had our policy makers said "depositors and customers will be protected, we will immediately exercise resolution authority over insolvent institutions, and bondholders will not be spared" we could have simply had a "writeoff recession" in paper assets, rather than an implosion of the real economy and an explosion in public debt.

The facts simply do not support the idea that taking receivership of insolvent financials leads to economic distress. Rather, it properly rests losses on the bondholders, and preserves the operation of the financial system by bolstering its solvency. One might argue that we could not possibly let bondholders take the trillions of dollars of losses that would have been required in order to restructure debt and get the bad obligations off the books. This is absurd. A 20% stock market decline wipes out about $3 trillion in market value. Indeed, given the size and average maturity of the U.S. bond market, just the increase in interest rates that we've observed over the past 6 weeks has knocked off trillions in market value.

The financial markets are perfectly capable of taking losses. They don't do well with disorganized piecemeal liquidation - where perfectly good loans are called in and countless positions have to be unwound - but that isn't required if your regulatory structure allows receivership/conservatorship that can cut away and gradually transfer the operating portion of an institution. What the global economy is not capable of taking is the uncertainty that results when policy makers apply arbitrary rules, leaving all other decision makers in the economy frozen at the edge of their seats to discover what the results of those arbitrary decisions will be. We have learned the wrong lesson, and we continue to pay for it.

Here's part 3 of Hussman's analysis. Sue me, I'm backwards:

3) Downside risk tends to be elevated precisely when risk premiums and volatility indices reflect the most complacency

I could go on, but nobody cares.


"I could go on, but nobody cares!"  


Let's look @ Hussman's $100 billion bank. It had $100b in assets (loans), $60b in deposits, $30b in bondholder (senior) debt and $10b in shareholder equity. Losses in the real estate market took assets to $80 rendering the bank insolvent: ($80 billion in assets, $60 billion in deposit liabilities, $30 billion in debt to bondholders, and -$10 billion in equity). The "operating portion" is the $80 billion in assets, along with the $60 billion of customer deposits, was sold as a "whole bank" transaction for $20 billion to another institution. The stockholders were wiped out, with the bondholders' stake converted to $20 billion in shares in the buying bank. What happens next?

Real estate continues to lose value keelhauling the new institution's assets the same way falling real estate undermined Hussman's original bank. Bank insolvency becomes self- sustaining as no new good loans (assets) are made to offset the rapidly devaluing existing loans. Net credit declines leaving values unsupported which effects assets system- wide. The only business that keeps the 'institutions' afloat is arbitraging the difference between short and long term lending rates and by trading credit derivatives: indirect forms of debt subsidy, courtesy of central bank manipulation of bond markets.

As the process gains internal momentum, asset devaluation outstrips the amounts bondholders have at risk, ruining all of them and the banks as well. Bondholders- turned stockholders are fed into the liquidation furnace. This is the mechanism behind Nicole Foss' suggestion that the likely final price level for (debt- free) real estate: that is, the cash value with all credit stripped out will be 90% below cycle highs. Absent a significant restructuring plan and resolution of property values relative to worker incomes there will simply be no credit available to anyone to buy anything. Prices will be set by whatever cash currency folks have in their pockets. Asset values will be meaningless as there will be no 'assets' per se.

This is no new invention but the sequence that destroyed banking and credit in the US and elsewhere in the early 1930's.

What John Hussman illuminates is a process dependent upon a return to bubble values: finance markets can sustain SOME losses not a total, self- amplified collapse of value. Losses cannot be confined to real estate. Price stability is insufficient to pay returns to the banks' assets, only liquidity- driven (bubble) growth. This is not any criticism of Hussman's analysis which is a classic model of restructuring. The problem is the need for exogenous support for values ... so that constantly declining assets do not continue to bleed balance sheets. Where do these supporting funds come from, an invasion of Bankers from Outer Space with spaceships full of money?

Right now the only support is more sovereign debt and the continuation of extend- pretend. Both of these are illusory as sovereigns can only recycle not create value nor can E/P conjure value when it has evaporated. The constant debt/subsidy requires the pristine appearance of 'integrity of debt'. This must be maintained at all cost which requires still more subsidy. This is the circular Ponzi Scheme Hussman paints.

Outside of the Ponzi lurks Irving Fisher's debt deflation. Anchored to fuel prices set in dollars and the self- destructive propensity of finance to serve itself at the expense of the rest, deflation cannot be outmaneuvered.

Take away the willingness of creditors to lend and galloping insolvency freezes the credit system. This is indeed what is taking place right now in the Eurozone. Borrowing is becoming more difficult, lending more risky and the loans less effective. Bondholders hold the euro hostage. At the same time, the hostage is already a corpse. Talk of 'haircuts' once started cannot be contained. Greece's suggestion a few days ago that it will quietly default sometime in the future triggered a mad panic in Credit Default Swaps written against Greek bonds.

Ambrose Evans- Pritchard:

The Greek newspaper Ta Nea said Athens was examining plans to impose a cut in interest rates on its debt and to extend maturities once the €110bn (£94bn) rescue deal from the EU and the International Monetary Fund expires in mid 2013.

The proposals stop short of "haircuts" on the principle of the debt and would be done in a co-operative fashion with bondholders. While this would qualify as an orderly restructuring of debt, it is tantamount to default.  Ta Nea said Brussels had given a "green light" to the idea, provided that Greece complies with the terms of its fiscal austerity package and carries out deep structural reforms.

The European Commission denied that it had given its blessing for "any restructuring of government bonds by Greece or anywhere else".

The claims caused a wild spike in credit default swaps for Greek debt, with ripple effects across the EMU periphery. Markit's iTraxx SovX Western Europe index measuring risk on sovereign debt in the region surged to a record 208 basis points in intra-day trading, though the moves may have been distorted by a lack of liquidity in the run-up to Christmas.

If Greece becomes the first country in developed Europe to restructure sovereign debt since the Second World War, it breaks a powerful taboo and risks opening the floodgates to serial defaults in southern Europe and Ireland.

"This is going to worry the markets a lot: if it is true, it changes the whole politics of the eurozone debt crisis," said Elizabeth Afseth, a bond expert at Evolution Securities.


The fantasy is that the hundreds of trillions of dollars/euros/yen/renmimbi in claims will all be repaid one way or another while keeping depositors whole and doing so on the backs of retirees and schoolchildren with growth constrained by $100 crude oil. The absurdity is self- evident and yet this is where the world places itself as a first prescription for 'recovery'..

Adults cannot even discuss the idea of an orderly restructuring because the creditors hold the world's finance structures by the heels from the ledge of very high window. Absent is the acknowledgement that any regime that can be held by the heels at all has nothing left to contribute to society.

Complacency belongs to those whistling past the graveyard. Where are the risks lurking? The Bernanke Money Laundry can be brought to an end by actions in Congress by way of Bernanke nemesis Ron Paul. Reining in the laundry would cause the stock market to decline, perhaps sharply. Congress can fail to extend the national debt ceiling for political (posturing) reasons triggering a government shutdown. A US state can default or an important city declare bankruptcy leading to a run out of municipal issues. Chinese hyperinflation can reach Hungarian or Weimar proportions: 100% or more per week. A run could be made against the banks of a large European country such as France or Italy. This would mean the end of the euro as the whole lacks the resources and -- more importantly -- the will to support the unpayable debt such a run would reveal.

The risk begins when Ireland's government- to- come tells the EU what it can do with its bailout of German and French banks on the backs of Irish working people.

Adults cannot speak about debt restructuring until it is forced on them, the same adults refuse to discuss energy conservation. Instead of creating an artificial fuel shortage with large 'incentives' to cut fuel use/waste we subsidize more waste! Instead of allocating fuel in a way that sets humane priorities and allows nature to recover from our all- out assault on it with our machines, the chosen path is to allow 'the market' to create real shortages. When these appear they will be distressing because there will be no way short of physical rationing to allocate what remains. Our fuel supply's affordability is determined by economic profitability.

Profitability declines because the credit system is insolvent. This reduces the funds available to extract harder to reach fuels. It also constrains the ability of customers to bid for it. Peak oil effects are amplified by the inability of society to afford the fuel as well as afford new means to 'use' it.

Here is Chris Skrebowski's observation from October's ASPO Convention: 



What are our options? What policies might work?


  • Leave it to the market and hope high prices will improve supply and reduce demand. This popular policy led to the 2008 crash.
  • Hope Opec sees our welfare as their priority. Hmmn ...
  • Keep activity at low levels and accept little growth and high unemployment
     Or we could:
  • Maximise efficiency in use
  • Maximise use of economic alternatives (The economic bit is the rub)
  • Maximise the use of alternative fuels (Shale gas is exciting but realistic?)
  • Start taking the oil out of transport (Not easy but probably the best policy)
  • Reduce the energy needed in our economies (Note -moving production overseas only moves the location of demand)
  • All these can and to some extent are being done but will it be fast enough to avoid the next price spike and its economic consequences?
     

ASPO-USA Washington
7-9 October 2010



I agree with Skrebowski to a point: our culture- wide energy bank is insolvent alongside our credit/money versions and for the same reason. Our assets -- workers output translated into aggregate demand -- is declining relative to liabilities which includes our massive fuel- wasting infrastructure. One cannot support the other. Absent conservation the only alternative is for an invasion of fuel tankers from Mars.

Friday, December 24, 2010

View From China ...

A friend of mine just got back from that country: he tells me Christmas is an incredibly big deal in Beijing, with Santas everywhere, Christmas carols, decorations, lights, shopping, trees ... everything.

Ebeneezer Scrooge? It seems that decades of making cheesy decorations for the USA have given China an incentive to absorb some of that shabby holiday cheer. I wonder if they ('They') have eggnog?

Do 'We' have eggnog, anymore? What about Yule logs, Father Christmas, Black Peter? Remember Zwarte Piet, the Moorish accomplice of Sinterklaas who went around beating bad kids with a stick? How about Krampus, the Christmas demon? Straight out of Germany, everything you need to know about the sadistic German national character is embodied in Krampus, who stuffs children into a sack and takes them to hell.

Stuffs Jews into boxcars and sends them to Treblinka ... Merry Christmas, you Christ- killing sub-humans! Christmas is all about authority run completely, absolutely amok: it's about corruption, conformity and punishment. If you are 'good' according to some bureaucratic shitfist with a 'paper' you are given a bribe and required to offer one at the same time. If you are bad you are cast into a pit.

Dear ol' Dad used to bring eggnog home every Christmas in a milk- carton-ish affair. It tasted like mud with sugar added. I suspect the adults added booze. Real eggnog is about the booze as is Christmas in general. Christmas in the US really didn't take off until the Roaring Twenties, radio and mass marketing arrived along with Prohibition, stock swindling and gangsters. Prohibition made booze risque and wildly fashionable along with the Frank Nitti's and Johnny Torrio's who supplied it. Christmas became a fabulous marketing opportunity, not just for little kids. Fashion and merchandising joined sex which became the foundation- stone of advertising. Whoring for big business hollowed out the Fat Man, demons and Jesus and reduced them to wraith- like shills. Like everything else in perverse post- Warhol America, Christmas has been strip mined for every sales angle leaving what little substance remains to be used as fill dirt.

Boomers must remember those booze- soaked Christmas parties leading to sex @ the office? This was the 'Fred MacMurray' 'Man in a Gray Flannel Suit' era.  Shoveling some 'Made- in- China' train sets and plastic horses @ the kids then racing back to that 'hot tamale' in accounting and having drunken sex on the top of a desk.

People with the good luck to have a desk today will not consider sexing about on it. Real unemployment @ 20% and 42 millions on food stamps tends to focus the mind. Christmas 2010 is all about desperation ... while favored finance parties like like it's 2004, the good cheer is not felt elsewhere. The tremulous public sits in front of cold fireplaces in unheated houses sweating with anxiety over what will come down the chimney.

Organizing Christmas @ our house was on a par with the Normandy invasion. The perfect tree had to be found which often meant sitting in a cold car for hours over a period of several days. The tree was then screwed around with endlessly then spray- painted silvery white. All this took place under the watchful direction of Obersturmbannfuhrer Mom. Errors with tree, spray paint or decorations were not permitted. Wrapping was to be just so and gift arrangement under the tree a science not far from arranging magnets in a cyclotron. All wrapping was recycled from previous years: Mom was a child of the Great Depression, after all.

This was done to add luster to packages of socks and underwear. We got clothes we would then wear to school. Most didn't fit because they were bought on sale the year before; growth was 'estimated' as is the case now of GDP 'growth' by the Department of Commerce.

Christmas was a time where the requirement was to be nice to everyone even as they were being insufferable to you! The Gestapo was always watching and beatings administered to those not toeing the line. I learned early- on the world is without pity when good morale is enforced with the knout. Meanwhile, the endless array of pointless tasks extended into the school days: cutting paper outlines and giving Christmas cards to the lout that sat next to you in class. This was the same lout who would wait between classes to fight you.

Did Ezzard Charles have to give a Christmas card to Rocky Marciano? (He probably did, actually, they were friends.)

Back at the ranch, the supremacy of Catholic ritual was set in stone. There was the endless Advent nonsense; creches and cardboard punch out Jesus's needed tending and nevermind not doing the job properly. Christmas @ my family's house was an Americana version of the Spanish Inquisition with all the baroque tendencies and dark, heavy furniture. When I read Poe's 'Pit and the Pendulum' with the seven guttering candles and dark judges I knew that story was all about Christmas. Caught between the rock of spam on one hand, the hard place of religiosity on the other, Poe's character gave an inappropriately tinted snow-flake shaped Christmas card to his enemy. Into a torture chamber with him!

By age 12 I absolutely detested Christmas with the same soul wrenching passion Captain Ahab reserved for white whales. Over the years, Christmas has not improved: A friend and I would go out looking for bars open on Christmas day. Most places were closed save where cops and newspaper reporters hung out. Cast in shades of depression blue on Christmas day, there were always more drunks than usual. When I lived in New York, I would go to Chinatown because the rest of the world city was shut down. Later, I became an instant Moslem on December, 25th. I'd go to the Afghani restaurant that taxi drivers and delivery men went to in order to find something to eat.

Life on the streets in the big, dirty city is hard enough. Those without families or houses, trees, Santas, carz or other accoutrements of modernity are losers whose anger becomes magnified on Christmas. Gifts and warm nights are not for them, only alcohol, dope or suicide. I have been robbed on Christmas and stabbed. Last year my father died two days before Christmas. It is a holiday filled with dread.



Merry Christmas, Suckers!


Now, the Chinese have imported Christmas. What respect I had for the Chinese people is evaporating fast. A worse example of slick modernity and consumption/waste in the repressive American- gangster style cannot be imagined. The sad beauty of some dude being born in a shit house in Roman Judea with self-sacrificial purpose of redeeming humanoids from ... what, exactly? ... is purged by a tsunami of endless and inexorable merchant 'obligations' stuffed into SUVs and Giant pickup trucks. Nothing but waste from Sea to shining Sea. From Gobi Desert and Siberia to the Himalayas to the Korean Peninsula and the Yellow ... shining Sea.

Andy Xie looks toward China and doesn't see much to like, either:

Good Tidings in 2011

One could describe the global economy as a race between the U.S. and China, to see who goes down first

The global economy may be coming up for a breath of fresh air in 2011. Fiscal and monetary policies around the world have been highly stimulated for three years. The additional monetary and fiscal stimulus measures by the U.S. could generate an upside surprise to its 2011 growth rate. Most emerging economies continue to grow rapidly. By the middle of 2011, most analysts may declare that the world has finally put the financial crisis behind.

The reality is quite different. The global economy is kept afloat by massive monetary and fiscal stimulus around the world. The main problem in the global economy – high costs and declining competitiveness in the developed world, and inflation plus asset bubbles in the developing world continue unabated. Either inflation in the developing world or unsustainable sovereign debt in the developed world will spark the next crisis.


Xie admits stimulus is a failure in the US as well as in China:

I have argued several times before why the U.S.'s stimulus won't bring lasting growth. I'm not sure that the stimulus advocates in the U.S. believe what they say. The real intention for the new Obama tax cut is to get him re-elected in 2012. The mid-term election this year shows that, unless the U.S.'s unemployment rate drops significantly, he will lose his re-election bid then.

The Fed's intention, I think, is to inflate away the U.S.'s debts. The U.S.'s household sector needs to cut its leverage by half to become normal again. If it is done through saving more, the U.S. economy will be weak for a long time, which would keep the fiscal revenue low and the government deficit out of control. The U.S. could slide into a vicious spiral. If the Fed manages to bring it down through inflation, the U.S. economy may escape such a fate.

Inflation is good for the U.S., because foreigners own nearly 100 percent of its GDP in financial assets. With its massive U.S. debt holdings, China will suffer especially hard. Indeed, if China's foreign exchange reserves evaporate in value, it becomes very vulnerable, unless its structural problems are solved.

Regardless of how one views the intentions and effectiveness of the U.S.'s policies, they lead to a good environment in 2011 for China to tackle its inflation problem without worrying about a big growth slowdown.

Stability, not fast growth, is China's priority.

China's nominal GDP may reach US$ 6 trillion in 2010. If it rises at 10 percent per annum in the next decade, half as much as in the past decade, it would reach US$ 15.6 trillion by 2020, rivaling the U.S.'s GDP today. Stable growth, rather maximum growth at high risk is now in China's best interest.

Some analysts argue that a developing country must go through a period of breakneck and unbalanced growth for it to jump out of poverty. I share this view. For most developing countries, they need to spend as much on infrastructure and increasing manufacturing capacity as possible. The conventional view on investment efficiency doesn't apply to developing countries. But, China has jumped through already. "Steady as she goes," can bring China into the developed world in the foreseeable future.

Now is not the time for China to take on too much risk for maintaining growth. Even a six percent growth rate is good enough for China. China should err on the conservative side in the trade off between growth and stability.


Growth ... grifters and grasping for the way of life that once seemed so easy but has turned into a pocket full of spears. The hands are out for the money from whomever it can be had:

The U.S. is dealing with its consequences of its financial crisis by running up government debt. It is doing what some European countries have been doing. Of course, the Fed can monetize the government debt, i.e., the U.S. doesn't have to beg for help to deal with its public debt in the future. But, printing money on such a scale will likely lead to the total collapse of the dollar's value, like the Russian ruble in 1998, and result in hyperinflation. While hyperinflation is beneficial to the U.S. by wiping clean its foreign debt, the dollar will forever lose its reserve currency status that might be worth three percent of GDP per annum and over half of GDP in present value. The U.S. may not gain from such a solution.

Xie puts a value on dollar seigniorage, the only thing the US has left to sell the rest of the world. Of course, Xie is wrong about monetizing: the central banks' owner/clients would not allow it, China and America are flip sides of the same Christmas coin. The American establishment cannot allow monetization as the wealthy own the loans and gain the vigorish. The Chinese establishment cannot allow deflation as the political elites have borrowed too much and the borrowings are pegged to a foreign currency: the dollar.

In this way, China is up a similar creek as Ireland but on a mind- bogglingly larger scale.  Xie wonders why the Chinese do not take effective steps against inflation that is beginning to rampage:

The government has been targeting credit expansion for the past year. But, the credit expansion outside of the system has made up for the slowdown within. For example, banks can sell corporate loans to their depositors directly, shrinking its balance sheet to meet the government's target. But, nothing has changed in reality. Fitch documented this phenomenon in its recent report.

The ineffectiveness of the recent measures casts doubts on the government's sincerity in fighting inflation. The constant and marginal policy announcements could be interpreted that the inflation fighting is now largely a propaganda job. Such perceptions could spark popular panic, which would cause the household sector to hoard goods like rice and cooking oil. When the masses flee from holding money, a full blown crisis will unfold.

I have been arguing for increasing interest rates. That won't cure inflation either. It is meant to compensate depositors to sustain the value of their wealth. It can prevent social unrest. To cure inflation, China must deal with government expenditures. Unless it is restrained, inflation will continue and keep rising.

There are two ways to limit local government expenditure. One is to cut their funding source. Their main revenue sources are land sales, property taxes, and bank loans. The last source is drying up a bit, as banks are saddled with high exposure to the sector already and are trying to decrease it. This change isn't biting yet because local governments haven't spent all the money they borrowed before.

Deflating the property bubble will have a bigger effect on local government funding. Last year, new property sales reached 14 percent of GDP. The money went one way or another into the government's coffers. Considering the pace of the property market growth local governments expect much more from it in the future. They have planned their expenditures accordingly.

The property under contraction may be worth half of China's 2010 GDP. The land banks that the property developers hold and local governments have prepared could build properties worth considerably more. If all these properties are sold at the current prices, the money supply needs to expand rapidly, at least continuing the 20 percent per annum pace of the past eight years, i.e., money supply doubling every four years. Runaway inflation is inevitable in such a scenario.


China is probably already past the point of no return. "When" says Xie, not, "if". China buys oil with dollars or euros (in addition to bilateral exchanges with Russia). Spending dollar reserves rather than yuan overseas on resource inputs is massively inflationary in China. China is living Steve From Virginia's First Law of Economics: the cost of China's dollar surplus in the form of Chinese hyperinflation is far greater than the value of the surplus itself. The cost emerges as destruction of the Chinese economy by the need to 'support' the value of the surplus. Trading dollars for resources overseas appears gain something of value for them, even as the high dollar prices for the resources feed back and accelerate yuan inflation in China. The more dollars the Chinese spend the higher the rate!

Desperate Chinese mercantilism sucks in more and more dollars so the spending cycle never ends. The vicious cycle is constantly amplified. Both China and the US central bank and its finance clients are locked together in a deadly embrace that neither knows how to break. Not only is China trapped by its F/X surplus, the effect is a yuan revaluation. Fighting inflation with high rates is counterproductive in the face of the dollar carry trade. Capital controls would make the yuan more valuable which would reward the hot money 'investors' with spectacular profits at the expense of both the Chinese people and its establishment.

Rising fuel prices in the US are deflationary as funds allocated toward fuel spending is diverted from wages. Rising fuel prices in manufacturing- centric China are inflationary as labor wage demands cannot be waved off. Inflation is a wage- price spiral. High prices in the US without increased wages are simply unaffordably high prices. In China, the high prices cause a demand for more money which workers need to keep pace. In the US, money is marooned behind structure that directs it toward finance. Labor is left with diminishing leverage and diminishing individual purchasing power along with declining aggregate demand.

China's establishment provides the appearance of purchasing power yet it has no other choice as its own actions are responsible for the price rises in the first place. The losers in China are its savers. In America the losers are ironically its businesses whose customers continue to vanish.

Keep in mind that a characteristic of hyperinflation is the appearance of a cash or liquidity shortage:

China money market rates jump, may delay tightening


By Lu Jianxin and Jason Subler

China's benchmark money market rate jumped 149 basis points to a fresh more than two-year high on Thursday, as traders cited an acute shortage of funds after a slew of official tightening steps.

The weighted average seven-day government bond repurchase rate rose to 5.6789 percent at 0400 GMT from 4.1868 percent at the close on Wednesday, after having repeatedly hit more than two-year highs since late November.

Traders said the money market squeeze was unprecedented since the seven-day repo rate became China's benchmark for short-term liquidity conditions in the early 2000s, except on a few occasions during mega equity initial public offerings (IPOs).

Such a crunch might force the People's Bank of China to delay its much anticipated further tightening steps until at least early February when a cash demand peak during the Lunar New Year is over, traders said.


It's not just the demons of US Christmas the Chinese have imported from the US empire, it is its excess money and credit. Every bit of moral hazard 'printed' by Kraken- Bernanke from his ZIRP policy is on its way to feed the furnace of Chinese hyperinflation. Damned if Lord Kraken does or doesn't. Raise rates and China's property bubble goes the way of the Tyrannosaurus Rex along with the high- end borrowers in the China Nomenklatura into the bottom of the pit. Raise rates and the US Potemkin economy is revealed as a cardboard Santa and the charade ends with blood in US and Chinese streets.

Revealed along with Potemkin Christmas of 2010 itself: a fest of flogging Moors, mad markets and hubristic policies gone awry. Stay home, children, do not open the doors, clean and load your revolvers and be fearful on this dreadful night of what will come down the chimney.